Commercially
available conductive paint was tested by stirring and painting lines in the
same manner as the other samples. The commercially available conductive paint
was much more liquid so it produced thinner traces. All traces were dried for
at least five hours in the order to test their resistance as it would be in a finished
project. Each substance was measured again with fixed-width probes. Close-up
pictures were taken of each sample using a macro lens. The lens has a very
shallow depth of field which is not flat so the samples are not entirely
visible. Acrylic paint with graphite powder is the most conductive sample in
this experiment when painted in a line like a circuit trace.
Toothpick
|
Thick
line
|
Thin
line
|
|
Glue-All
|
18.8
KΩ
|
10.5
KΩ
|
11.2
KΩ
|
Titebond
III
|
115.1
KΩ
|
75.2
KΩ
|
9.9
KΩ
|
Acrylic
paint
|
1.8
KΩ
|
60 Ω
|
1.161
KΩ
|
1.490
KΩ
|
338
Ω
|
26.1
KΩ
|
Sampling surface
Glue-All samples being tested
Titebond III samples being tested
Commercially available conductive paint samples being tested
Close-up of Glue-All and graphite sample
Close-up of Titebond III and graphite sample
Close-up of acrylic paint and graphite sample
Close-up of commercially available conductive paint sample
Stirring the commercially available conductive paint to show viscosity
To
do:
- Translate to an Instructable
- Devise a distribution method
Journal page
A list showing of all the final posts of COMPLETED projects.
Disclaimer for http://24hourengineer.blogspot.com/
This disclaimer must be intact and whole. This disclaimer must be included if a project is distributed.
All
information in this blog, or linked by this blog, are not to be taken
as advice or solicitation. Anyone attempting to replicate, in whole or
in part, is responsible for the outcome and procedure. Any loss of
functionality, money, property or similar, is the responsibility of
those involved in the replication.
All digital communication regarding the email address 24hourengineer@gmail.com becomes
the intellectual property of Brian McEvoy. Any information contained
within these messages may be distributed or retained at the discretion
of Brian McEvoy. Any email sent to this address, or any email account
owned by Brian McEvoy, cannot be used to claim property or assets.
Comments
to the blog may be utilized or erased at the discretion of the owner.
No one posting may claim claim property or assets based on their post.
This blog, including pictures and text, is copyright to Brian McEvoy.
I only tested a single color of paint which I had on hand but I suspect some metallic sheen paints would conduct differently. If I were going to make a large batch I would likely choose those paints over plain colors now that you mention it. You got my brain ticking again and here I thought I was done with this project.
ReplyDeleteThe pictures for the readings tell the story and you are right that the test results didn't make logical sense. All I was looking for was for was a rough idea of which medium conducted well while maintaining a usable consistency. The paint stood out as a clear winner so I called it. The tests I ran were not scientifically rigorous in fact I would put them on par with a high school science experiment.
I see what you're saying. I'm probably less of a chemist than you but I think some reds may use iron oxide as a pigment and that has a lot of potential. At least it would when I applied voltage. Sorry, I couldn't resist that joke. Or that one.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how the hobby store would feel about me opening all their paints and dipping my probe leads in. They probably wouldn't be too keen on it and I don't think paint inspector is a real thing.
My analog/digital communications teacher was a HAM operator and had been for years. When they finally dropped the necessity to learn Morse Code he really pushed us to get our licenses. Sadly I didn't and now the hack space I go to has a HAM station I could use if I were licensed.
If you make a winning recipe I will gladly link from this site. Good luck.
Maybe you can give the sales pitch for ham radio to me and anyone else following this comment thread. The internet can provide all the communication I need so what's the appeal of doing it over analog?
ReplyDeleteI have heard that when tragedies strike that civilian radio operators are some of the first to respond and instrumental as a communication hub. To date that's the most appealing thing I've heard.
It would be awesome if you found a recipe that tested better than what I've done and I think the readers would appreciate another set of hands testing!
Those of us who fly RC sailplanes could easily put in motors and bore holes in the sky, but we'd probably fall asleep out of boredom. My guess is that HAM operators would feel the same way about the internet. I imagine they like playing around with antennas and mastering all sorts of technical info. Somewhere I have a stack of radio contact cards that my ex's father gave me. Rather interesting, from a bunch of different far away places.
ReplyDelete---------
On the conductive paint, my guess is that a lot of the resistance is at the junction between the voltmeter probe and the material. You've got a variably shaped surface with very little contact area. It's also not clear that the proportion of graphite to paint is constant all the way through the material. Maybe in some cases the paint/glue comes to the outside. You might try making some standard size copper pads and running tracks between them. Or figure out how to make a really consistent, large surface, and use a good sized chunk of metal placed on it instead of a voltmeter probe. Maybe you can just built it up thick and sand it down flat?
------------
Curious as to exactly what sort of graphite you're using. (Brand, composition, etc.)
-----------
Someday, I am going to get my van de Graaff generator going again, and it needs a better terminal. Metal spinning is kind of expensive.
asdqwe
ReplyDeletethank you very much!!
ReplyDelete